February 10., 2021: 2:06pm Madeleine Dean, D-PA, argued that "Of 62 cases, he lost all but 1... Court after Court... said these cases were not credible, without merit..."
Senate Session - February 10, 2021...
The argument continues to claim that election fraud has been denied by judge after judge in the courts, and that Trump's call to stop the vote incited violence because election fraud never happened...
February 10., 2021: 2:35pm Ted Lieu, D-CA, Trump tried everything in his attempt to cease power... Pursuing claims in the courts to attacking members of congress and the senate and then the vice president... Some got death threats...
Senate Session - February 10, 2021...
Stacey Plaskett, D-Virgin Islands, 2:41pm Incited a mob to storm the Capitol... Clear evidence that President Trump incited violence... when he ran out of other options... Truth and facts are overwhelming... Video shows reporter called proud boys white supremicists when interviewing Trump... Full context of video?
Senate Session - February 10, 2021...
February 10, 2021: 3:31pm Video of Giuliani saying "Trial by Combat." Full context missing.
Senate Session - February 10, 2021...
February 11, 2021: 2:49PM: Joaquin Castro: D-TX: ...items were stolen... you have terrorsits who would love to destroy the Capitol... They just saw how easy it is...
...versus...
Was it ever proven that fraud didn't happen?
Did Trump make death threats? Did Trump pursue all avenues to examine the possibility of fraud?
Did any court hear the evidence and rule against fraud? Are any courts still hearing cases of fraud? Have any courts ruled in favor of fraud? Were protestors Paid Actors or Trump Extremists that were Incited by Trump's speeches?
Many court cases were dismissed according to 'lack of standing' and without viewing any evidence...
Example: "The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution."
Are the Senators basing their impeachment case against Trump on court decisions that never ruled for or against fraud, but for lack of standing?
See Texas vs. Pennsylvania' s dismmissal as lack of standing.
MOOT: Supreme Court No. 22O155: Texas, Plaintiff v. Pennsylvania, et al.
The Silver Bullet defence... Lack of Standing...
FEDERAL COURT REMINDS DEFENDANTS THAT DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF STANDING CAN BE A PYRRHIC VICTORY...
Giuliani's Full Speech...
Giuliani speaks at 2:19 in the C-Span video...
See more about election fraud evidence and senate hearings...
See the BullShift News December 14, 2020 Edition
"First, of the 80 total lawsuits, 34 have either been withdrawn, consolidated with other suits, or dismissed due to legal technicalities such as lack of standing, timing, or jurisdiction. Those judges who dismissed suits never heard the actual evidence of election irregularities and/or fraud, since they did not allow it to be presented in their courtrooms. Such cases cannot be counted as a loss for Trump. If anything, they are evidence of a failure of our judicial system to – at a moment of national crisis – actually address election fraud.
Of the 46 remaining lawsuits, 25 cases are still ongoing, so that the winner and loser of these cases is yet to be determined, while 21 have been completely adjudicated. These are cases where the court heard arguments, considered any relevant evidence, and then issued a formal ruling on the merits.
You may be surprised to learn that, of these 21 cases, Trump has won 14 and lost 7."
There is Something Very Curious Happening With Trump’s Election Lawsuits…...